Steve Pugh
22 May 2009 @ 06:37 pm
So I found this file, last modified 10 June 1997, on a set of back ups and it's a pub quiz that I ran in Balliol bar. In fact considering the date I suspect that this is the night that [info]pink_weasel first clapped eyes on me and thought "nice guy, shame about the jumper".

People on facebook and twitter said that they wanted to see the quiz, so here goes.
Onwards to the quiz )
 
 
Steve Pugh
31 August 2008 @ 10:28 pm

From Cocktail Party Physics, via Pharyngula comes another book meme, this one about popular science books. The rules are:

  1. Highlight those you've read in full
  2. Asterisk those you intend to read
  3. Add any additional popular science books you think belong on the list
  4. Link back to the great pop-sci book project
Books, with big words in them )
 
 
Very True Mood: frustrated
 
 
Steve Pugh
09 August 2008 @ 09:54 am

Via one of the guest bloggers on Pharyngula comes a link to A Survey of Public Understanding of Evolution.

Go fill it in. I doubt the results will be very surprising - people who 'believe' in evolution tend to be better educated, more left wing and less religious than those who don't. Survey after survey has shown this. What will be interesting to see is the answeres to the first two questions which are a little bit more in depth.

To the best of your understanding, and in your own words, please explain what "evolution" means.

To which my answer was:

The change over time of the genetic makeup of a biological population. Changes are introduced via random mutation and their frequency within the population is determined by factors including natural and sexual selection.

Not a perfect answer but I think it contains the essentials.

 
 
Very True Mood: pensive
 
 
Steve Pugh
26 March 2008 @ 09:42 pm
Went to see 10,000 BC this afternoon. Oh boy, history, biology, geography, astronomy - they all get a hammering in this film. I can't be bothered to even start listing everything that was goofy here.

It was one of the most by-the-numbers renditions of (the easy to understand bits of) Joseph Campbell's monomyth that I'd seen in a while. I smiled at the bemusement when hunter-gatherers first came across the evidence of agriculture, but of course in Campbell's scheme there has to be a 'boon' to take back home at the end (sorry, that was a spoiler). There were also bits lifted from the Bible, Stargate, Conan and 300, just in case the mention of Campbell misled you into thinking there were highbrow sources being used.

The action and CGI were very good, the actors managed to keep straight face. It's not a bad movie in the sense that it's exciting and visual, but it's certainly one to watch with the brain switched off.

Oh, by the way, the Doctor Who and Star Trek trailers look amazing on the big screen.
 
 
Very True Mood: sleepy
 
 
Steve Pugh
21 March 2008 @ 03:59 pm
There's a pro-creationism, anti-science movie called Expelled, in which a number of prominent scientists were conned into providing interviews by the producers describing a very different and more balanced movie. One of these scientists, PZ Myers, tried to attend a screening and was turned away on instructions from the producers, but there's a twist. To see why this was as about a perfect own goal as can be, read his account of the evening.
 
 
Very True Mood: chipper
Very True Music: Let's Make Love And Listen To Death From Above - CSS
 
 
Steve Pugh
18 January 2008 @ 03:47 pm
'Darkest ever' material created.

Goths rejoice. Except being Goths, they don't.

:-P
 
 
Steve Pugh
29 July 2007 @ 02:33 pm
Looking through some old comments that I'd left to moulder in the moderation queue, I cam across this gem:

why will we never know how dinosaurs died because we never knew what they were like i think that we will never know what and how they went extinct and you scintist stop tring so hard



First things first, this comment was left on a page listing 15mm scale miniature dinosaurs. Yes, a page about toy dinosaurs that doesn't discuss the science of dinosaurs or the reason for their extinction at all.

It is true that we may never know with 100% certainty what caused the extinction of all non-avian dinosaurs some sixty five million years ago. However, their is a large and growing body of evidence that lets us form a number of hyoptheses. Falling sea levels, increased volcanic activity and a massive meteorite impact probably all played their part.

Further study into the K-T extinction will not only tell us more about the end of the dinosaurs but will provide us with insights into the effect that climate change can have on the Earth and the creatures that live here. A subject that is of obvious importance to all of us.
 
 
Steve Pugh
25 February 2007 @ 11:09 pm

Your Squid Quotient = 156.25

Interpreting your results: An average Squid Quotient is around 100. A SQ of 100 means you have a normal affinity for squid. A SQ above 100 means you have an attraction or fondness for squid. Below 100 means that you should probably stay away from the deep ocean.

find out your squid quotient



You scored as Sgt. Benton. You are Sgt. Benton! Calm, fixed, resolute: for being such a nice person you have a bit of cynicism that you keep hidden. It helps you sort out the good from the bad when you deal with people. Not easily fooled by mere charm or facade, you are, all the same, a simple soul. You long for love but don't quite comprehend romance. you recognize that a stable home, longterm friendships, and trust and respect are the foundations of a happy life.

Sgt. Benton
 
68%
Captain Mike Yates
 
57%
Jo Grant
 
57%
Brigadier Lethbridge Stewart
 
50%
The Master
 
46%
Doctor Who (Third Doctor)
 
29%

Which Doctor Who Character are you?
created with QuizFarm.com

 
 
Very True Mood: mellow
 
 
Steve Pugh
18 February 2007 @ 08:43 am
When I saw the trailers for yesterday's episode of Primeval I wondered whether they were going to give any explanation of how the giant arthropods could survive in our atmosphere, and pleasantly they did - oxygen rich air leaking through the rift anomaly from the Carboniferous.

Then they go and spoil it by having the good looking bloke use a blowtorch right in front of the rift anomaly with no side effects what so ever. If the oxygen levels were high enough to affect the soldiers then wouldn't any flames also be affected?

Oh, and they doubled the size of Arthropleura. There could be a larger species that simply hasn't been found in the fossil record yet...

Science aside, it's fun tea time nonsense, but the geek is very annoying and only Douglas Henshaw shows any signs of actually being able to act.

One last thing. We've all been conned. On the ITV web site for the series there's a list of creatures. Have a look and see if you spot whats missing:
  • Coelurosauravus
  • Scutosaurus
  • Gorgonopsid
  • Giant Spiders
  • Arthropleura
  • Mosasaur
  • Hesperonis
  • Dodo
  • Parasite
  • Pteranodon
  • Agnurognathus
  • Predator

Not one of those is a dinosaur. No dinosaurs. Weren't we promised dinosaurs? But all we get is arthropods, synapsids, and birds (I know birds are dinosaurs). Give us some proper dinos!

 
 
Very True Mood: irritated
 
 
Steve Pugh
20 December 2006 @ 11:54 am
Quick post before I dash off the work Christmas party.

Today there's a blogathon marking the tenth anniversary of the death of Carl Sagan.

My parents had the large colourful hadcover of Cosmos and it was one of those books that I was always taking off the shelf and reading, understanding more and more of it as I got older. Probably one of the formative influences that led me to read physics at university. Very simply, he was one of the greatest communicators and popularizer of science that there has ever been.
 
 
Very True Mood: busy
 
 
Steve Pugh
04 December 2006 @ 03:20 pm
This morning I had a conversation with Lettice about the difference between methodological naturalism and philosophical naturalism. Somehow, somewhere between my brain and her brain, it got turned into this.
 
 
Very True Mood: thoughtful
 
 
Steve Pugh
18 November 2006 @ 12:23 pm
Hey [info]gleet! You're in the Guardian's Bad Science column today. Your media whoredom has been recognised at last.
Tags: ,
 
 
Very True Mood: silly
 
 
Steve Pugh
09 November 2006 @ 09:48 pm

Via [info]sharikkamur

N...Nitrogen

You scored 28 Mass, 47 Electronegativity, 37 Metal, and 0 Radioactivity!

Sweet! You're quirky and non-confrontational... but you are also highly dynamic in relationships. You're kinda that "anything to anyone" type, but you don't demand that people love you for it. You very much do you own thing... and probably by extention you're the only one who can do the things you do. You're rarely found alone, but you'd get along great with other people like yourself. You're probably the only element that should try to find a mate who is just like you. Oh, and too much of you in a high-pressure situation can make other people act drunk... or die.

The Which Chemical Element Am I Test written by effataigus

Does anyone remember when I used to do proper posts? No, me neither.

Tags: ,
 
 
Very True Mood: thoughtful
 
 
Steve Pugh
11 July 2006 @ 10:24 am
As if I didn't have enough to read, here are a few more blogs that I've been looking at lately.

Darren Naish: Tetrapod Zoology - Incredibly fascinating science stuff.

Yours in a White Wine Sauce - Military History that never was.

Too many Ideas - SFSFW stalwart Mark Caldwell's computer art, writing and other stuff.

ThePickards - some northern bloke who's related to some other northern bloke that I work with. Web accesssibilty and football rants.

The Flogging Will Continue - Daniel James, aka Captain Cleaver, the head of Three Rings on MMORPGs and the future of entertainment.


 
 
Very True Mood: pleased
 
 
Steve Pugh
04 May 2006 @ 07:51 pm

Via [info]lonemagpie and Pharyngula come two memes, the results of which seem to fit together fairly well.

What is Your World View? )The Atheist Test )
 
 
Very True Mood: cheerful
Very True Music: The Undertones
 
 
Steve Pugh
Spoilers. Yes spoilers. Lots of them. You have been warned.

Right, let's get the science bit out of the way. No not the moonlight and diamonds stuff, that's just pure bollocks anyway. Queen Victoria did not, technically speaking, have haemophilia - it's a recessive trait carried on the X chromosone and hence women only have it if both parents carried the defective gene. She was however a carrier and passed on the gene to her children. For her to have been "infected" in 1879, long after the birth of her children would pose a problem. Unless we want to believe that she went wolf and bit [1] all her children [2]. So it looks like the scratch was just a scratch after all.

The episode opens with probably the best fight sequence in the 43 year history of Doctor Who. Not actually a very hard task. But why were the monks wearing red? Didn't it occur to the production team that everyone watching would think of those terrible BBC1 channel idents? And a good old fashioned scream at the end of the teaser - that would have been the episode one cliffhanger in old year following a whole load of wandering around on the moors and getting the various characters to bump into each other.

Good stuff - Ian Dury. Maggie Thatcher. Doctor James McCrimmon. Naked Rose (not naked enough for a large part of the audience). Nice Bad Wolf reference. Queen Victoria shooting the monk. Superb work from the supporting cast, especially Pauline Collins. The "books are the best weapons" line (borrowing heavily from the Buffy research scenes?).

So so stuff - The 'not amused' running gag. CGI Werewolf worked well in close up but moved a bit odd in long shot. The Torchwood links could have been, oh, about a hundred times, more subtle. Typically dodgy science.

Bad stuff - Not much.

So the Doctor has pissed off Queen Victoria now as well as Harriet Jones, Prime Minister. After destryoing his home planet is RTD now making him unwelcome anywhere and anytime in his adopted home?

The implication that the Doctor and Rose are getting too cocky and actively seeking out danger looks like it will be this year's theme. Should be interesting to see where this goes. The things that niggle me about Tennant's performance might be sorted out if he has to portray a Doctor who gets shaken up by a big mistake at some point.

I'm giving this one 9/10.

[Updates]
[1] - Ah, there was a line to this effect but I missed it first time around because I was talking about the haemophilia bit being rubbish.

[2] - Not all her children. Just those that had the haemophilia gene (a carrier like Queen Victoria has a 50% chance of passing it on to each child) - Princess Alice, Princess Beatrice, and Prince Leopold. And despite all the inbreeding amongst her descendents the gene has not reached the current royal family. Unless, as the Doctor implies, the werewolf DNA multiplies within the host body over the generations and stops manifesting itself as haemophilia and starts manifesting itself as lycanthropy, but in that case Victoria wouldn't have been doing any biting and so we go round and round in circles...


 
 
Very True Mood: cheerful
 
 
Steve Pugh
23 March 2006 @ 12:46 pm
... that creationists couldn't get their feet any further down their throats, they come up with a real gem. Via Pharyngula, we learn that the according to the big brains at Answers in Genesis, only creatures with red blood are alive. Good one guys.
Tags: ,
 
 
Very True Mood: giggly
 
 
Steve Pugh
10 March 2006 @ 09:38 am
Oddly enough, the top to items in my newsreader this morning were about celebrity physicists and the media whoredom of a scientist. Not that this has any relevance to any close personal friends...
Tags: ,
 
 
Very True Mood: still icky, it's so not fair!
 
 
Steve Pugh
12 February 2006 @ 10:58 am
Today is the 197th birthday of both Abraham Lincoln and Charles Darwin.

[Update] No, Lettice, they are not still alive.
 
 
Very True Mood: blank
 
 
Steve Pugh

"... reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled."

— Richard Feynman

If you thought that biological evolution was the only science being attacked by the religious nutjobs in the US, think again. A Bush appointed fuckwit in the NASA press office is trying his best to wedge religion into astronomy: [via Bad Astronomy]

The Big Bang is “not proven fact; it is opinion,” Mr. Deutsch wrote, adding, “It is not NASA’s place, nor should it be to make a declaration such as this about the existence of the universe that discounts intelligent design by a creator.”

Makes me want to hit something.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe...."

— Albert Einstein

 
 
Very True Mood: angry
Very True Music: Someone Else To Blame - Midnight Oil